Many organizations spend enormous amounts of time evaluating markets, customer segments, and growth initiatives, yet surprisingly few first agree on what makes an opportunity attractive. In this episode, Tom and Mary discuss why defining success before evaluating options creates better strategic decisions, stronger organizational alignment, and fewer debates driven by opinion. Through a real client example, they show how changing the question—not the product—can completely transform a company’s future.
Key Takeaways
- Define attractiveness before evaluating opportunities. The best strategic decisions begin with agreeing on the criteria that make an opportunity attractive.
- A common scorecard creates organizational alignment. When everyone evaluates opportunities using the same criteria, discussions become more objective and strategic.
- This thinking extends far beyond markets. The same approach can improve decisions about acquisitions, hiring, partnerships, capital investments, and internal projects.
Quotes
“The biggest mistake companies make is asking which opportunity is best before agreeing on what makes an opportunity attractive.”
“The scorecard doesn’t make the decision—it simply makes sure everyone is making the decision for the same reasons.”
“Looking back, the answer always seems obvious. That’s why these opportunities are often hiding in plain sight.”
Before you evaluate your next opportunity, take the time to define what success actually looks like—you may discover the best decision was hidden in plain sight all along.
Mary Abbazia
Tom Spitale
